So the global warming crowd realizes that people are wising up to their shenanigans. Naturally, they decide to start calling it something else and issue talking points in order to fool the people:
Instead of grim warnings about global warming, the firm advises, talk about “our deteriorating atmosphere.” Drop discussions of carbon dioxide and bring up “moving away from the dirty fuels of the past.” Don’t confuse people with cap and trade; use terms like “cap and cash back” or “pollution reduction refund.”
No matter what they dress it up as, it’s still a scam that’s designed to confiscate people’s money, dictate how they’ll live, and advance liberalism/socialism in this country. That’s all it ever was about, and all it ever will be about.
I noted, several years ago, that they weren’t calling it global warming any more, they were instead referring to it as “climate change”. That was so they could point to virtually any weird weather phenomenon and claim we were at fault for it. More hurricanes = climate change. Fewer hurricanes = climate change. Cooler temps = climate change. Hotter temps = climate change. Less rain = climate change. More rain = climate change.
You get the idea. No matter what happens, if it’s out of the ordinary or a fluke, you better believe that some soil-munching, tree-hugging druid from the left will be on MSNBC the next day crying into his soy milk about how we’re killing the planet. These people demand that we all cast off our standard of living and go back to the pre-industrial age. But don’t you dare suggest that they lead by example. Regardless of what they say or what they believe, they will continue to live in their big houses, drive their SUVs, fly private jets, and run their air conditioners. When they say “we”, they actually mean “you”. That alone should tell you that even they know this is a fraud.
People on the left know they cannot win a fact-based debate, so they lie. They twist poll results to show what they want it to show. They pump up a phony, liberal-invented crisis and then propose liberal-benefiting solutions. They run as “new Democrats”, only to reveal — after safely elected — that they’re actually to the far left. Liberals know that if the people realize what they are and what they believe in, they’ll be sent packing, so they try and hide it as much as they can. Thus, the need for new terms and new definitions. Whatever they dress it up as, it’s still the same ol’ liberalism/socialism underneath.

